Tag: SMB 3.0

Cisco UCS Hardware

Cisco UCS supports RoCE for Microsoft SMB Direct

As you may know we use SMB as the storage protocol for several Hyper-V deployments using Scale-Out File Server and Storage Spaces which adds a lot value to your Hyper-V deployments. To boost performance Microsoft is using RDMA or SMB Direct to accelerate Storage network performance.

RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) allows direct memory access over an Ethernet network. RoCE is a link layer protocol, and hence, it allows communication between any two hosts in the same Ethernet broadcast domain. RoCE delivers superior performance compared to traditional network socket implementations because of lower latency, lower CPU utilization and higher utilization of network bandwidth. Windows Server 2012 and later versions use RDMA for accelerating and improving the performance of SMB file sharing traffic and Live Migration. If you need to know more about RDMA or SMB Direct checkout my blog post: Hyper-V over SMB: SMB Direct

With Cisco UCS Manager Release 2.2(4), Cisco finally supports RoCE for SMB Direct. It sends additional configuration information to the adapter while creating or modifying an Ethernet adapter policy.

Guidelines and Limitations for SMB Direct with RoCE

  • SMB Direct with RoCE is supported only on Windows Server 2012 R2.
  • SMB Direct with RoCE is supported only with Cisco UCS VIC 1340 and 1380 adapters.
  • Cisco UCS Manager does not support more than 4 RoCE-enabled vNICs per adapter.
  • Cisco UCS Manager does not support RoCE with NVGRE, VXLAN, NetFlow, VMQ, or usNIC.
  • You can not use Windows Server NIC Teaming together with RMDA enabled adapters in Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2012 R2 or you will lose RDMA feature on these adapters.
  • Maximum number of queue pairs per adapter is 8192.
  • Maximum number of memory regions per adapter is 524288.
  • If you do not disable RoCE before downgrading Cisco UCS Manager from Release 2.2(4), downgrade will fail.

Checkout my post about Hyper-V over SMB:



vmem-page-banner-memory-platform

Violin Memory Scale-out Memory Platform with SMB 3.0 Integration

If you are looking at Storage vendors for Hyper-V you really need to have a look at a storage solutions with SMB 3.0 integration. Because the Hyper-V over SMB scenario will be the future. So until some weeks ago you had 3 options, you could choose EMC VNX, NetApp or a Windows Server Scale-Out File server with or without storage spaces. I haven’t had the chance to test the EMC solution but on paper it looks nice, NetApp solutions lacks a lot of integration such as active-active configurations as well as lacking support for SMB Multichannel or SMB Direct (RDMA). A lot of customers also are looking at the Storage Spaces solutions with Scale-Out file Server which basically supports all the features you need but not offers the benefits an appliance solution brings with support.

Some weeks ago Violin Memory announced a solutions called the Scale-out Memory Platform which is built on their 6000-series. Until today Violin Memory Flash Memory Arrays provide power for performance, high availability, and scalability in enterprise block storage environments. Now these powerful arrays provide a new class of file based solutions with Microsoft Server 2012 R2 directly installed on the array. Microsoft and Violin Memory worked closely to develop this class of solution by bringing the power of memory to Microsoft applications such as SQL Server and Microsoft Hyper-V.

This would offer an appliance solution of the Hyper-V over SMB 3.0 scenario. At the moment there are not a lot of information out there but I will expect more information shortly and if you need more information checkout the Violin Memory page.



EMC – SMB 3.0 is the Future of Storage

At the moment I am working in a lot of customer cloud deployment projects and the huge topic at the moment are networking and storage. In the networking part there is a lot of talk going on, on “small” things like NIC Teaming and also on bigger topics like Network Virtualization. On the storage part I think a lot of customers are ready to take new approach to save money and get a better solutions. The main parts I talk a lot about is Storage Spaces and Hyper-V over SMB. I already wrote a lot about Hyper-V over SMB, which is not only in my opinion the future of storage. EMC released a solution overview for their EMC VNX and VNXe solution which offer SMB 3.0. EMC calls SMB 3.0 “The Future of Storage”.

SMB 3.0 is the Future of Storage

SMB 3.0 in Windows 8 clients and Windows 2012 servers is the future of storage protocols. It gives excellent performance with low CPU overhead – plus fault tolerance. Its load balancing/scaling will adjust throughput to available NICs and it also supports simultaneous access by multiple cluster hosts, with build-in arbitration for data consistency. There’s also file-share VSS (RVSS) backup support that facilitates the capture of application-consistent backups on SMB shares. This resiliency, combined with increasing Ethernet speeds, open up the potential for demanding, mission critical workloads such as Hyper-V and Microsoft SQL Server, to be placed on NAS.

You can read more here: EMC VNX and VNXe with Microsoft SMB 3.0

As I already mentioned I deployed SMB 3.0 and Hyper-V over SMB a couple of times and for me this is absolutely the way to go: No Fiber channel, no more iSCSI. And it’s funny that EMC the owner of VMware is calling SMB 3.0 the Future of Storage. I have to admit the EMC VNX and VNXe solutions on paper look pretty great and it looks like EMC did a great job implementing SMB 3.0. Unfortunately I could not test and VNX or VNXe yet.

EMC SMB 3 the future of Storage

Btw make sure you read my other blog post on SMB 3.0:



SMB Scale-Out File Server

Hyper-V over SMB: Scale-Out File Server and Storage Spaces

On some community pages my blog post started some discussions why you should use SMB 3.0 and why you should use Windows Server as a storage solution. Let me be clear here, you don’t need Windows Server as a storage to make use of the Hyper-V over SMB 3.0 scenario, you can use storage form vendors like NetApp or EMC as well. But in my opinion you can get a huge benefit by using Windows Server in different scenarios.

  • First you can use Windows Server together with Storage Spaces, which will offer you a really great enterprise and scalable storage solution for low cost.
  • Second you can use Windows Server to mask your existing Storage, by building a layer between the Hyper-V hosts and your storage. So you easily extend your storage even with other vendors.

At the moment there are not a lot of vendors out there which offer SMB 3.0 in there storage solution. EMC was one of the first supporting SMB 3.0 and with ONTAP 8.2 Netapp is now supporting SMB 3.0 as well. But if you want to build a SMB layer for a storage which does not support SMB 3.0. to mask your storage so you can mix it with different vendors or using it with Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces, the solution would be the Scale-Out File Server cluster. Microsoft offers file server cluster for a while now, but since this was an active/passive cluster, this was not really a great solution of a Hyper-V storage environment (even if a lot of small iSCSI storage boxes are active/passive as well).

Basically what the Scale-Out File Server let you do it so cluster up to 10 file servers which all will share CSVs (Cluster Shared Volumes) like you know from Hyper-V hosts and present SMB shares which are created on the CSV volumes. And the great thing about that, every node can offers the same share this will be a active/active solution up to 8 nodes. Together with SMB Transparent Failover the Hyper-V host does not really get any storage downtime if on of the SOFS nodes fails.

SMB Scale-Out File Server

For the storage guys out there think about the cluster nodes as your storage controllers. Most of the time you will have 2 controllers for fail-over and a little bit of manual load balancing where one LUN is offered by controller 1 and the other LUN is offered by controller 2. With the Scale-Out File Server you don’t really have that problem since the SMB share is offered on all hosts at the same time and up to 8 “controllers”. With Windows Server 2012 one Hyper-V host connected to one of the SOFS nodes and used multiple paths to this node by using SMB Multichannel, the other Hyper-V host connected automatically to the second SOFS node so both nodes are active at the same time. In case on of the SOFS nodes dies, the Hyper-V host fails over to the other SOFS node without any downtime for the Hyper-V Virtual Machines.

In Windows Server 2012 R2, Microsoft worked really hard to make this scenario even better. In Windows Server 2012 R2 a Hyper-V host can be connected to multiple SOFS node at the same time. Which means that VM1 and VM2 running on the same Hyper-V hosts can be offered by two different SOFS nodes.

Advantages of the Scale-Out File Server

  • Mask your storage and use different vendors
  • Scale up to 8 nodes (controllers)
  • Active/Active configuration
  • Transparent Failover
  • Supporting features like SMB Multichannel and SMB Direct
  • Easy entry point with SMB shares
  • Easy configuration, Hyper-V host and Cluster objects need access on the shares
  • Same Windows Server Failover Cluster Technology with the same management tools

Storage Spaces

As already mentioned you can use your already existing storage appliance as storage for your Scale-Out File Server CSVs or you could use Windows Server Storage Spaces which allow you to build great storage solution for a lot less money. Again, the Scale-Out File Server Cluster and Windows Server Storage Spaces are two separate things you don’t need a SOFS cluster for Storage Spaces and you don’t need Storage Spaces for a SOFS cluster, but of course both solutions work absolutely great together.

Windows Server Storage Spaces vs Traditional Storage

Microsoft first released there Software Defined Storage solution called Storage Spaces in Windows Server 2012 and this allows you basically to build your own storage solution based on a simple JBOD hardware solution. Storage spaces is a really cost-effective storage solution which allows companies to save up to 75% of storage costs in compare to traditional SAN storage.  It allows you to pool disks connected via SAS  (in Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 USB works as well for home users) and create different Virtual Disks (not VHDs) on these Storage Pools. The Virtual Disks, also called Storage Spaces, can have different resiliency levels like Simple, Mirror or Parity and you can also create multiple disks on one storage pool and even use thing provisioning. This sounds a lot like a traditional storage appliance right? True, this is not something totally different, this is something storage vendors do for a long time. But of course you pay a lot of money for this blackbox the storage vendors offer you. With Windows Server Storage Spaces Microsoft allows you to build our “own storage” on commodity hardware which will save you a lot of money.

Storage Space

This is not only just an “usable solution” this solution comes with some high-end storage features, which make the Storage Spaces and Windows File Server a perfect storage at low cost.

  • Windows Server Storage Spaces let you use cheap hardware
  • Offers you different types of resiliency, like Simple (Stripe), Mirror or Parity (also 3-way Mirror and Parity)
  • Offers you thin-provisioning
  • Windows Server File Server allows you to share the Storage via SMB, iSCSI or NFS.
  • Read-Cache – Windows Server CSV Cache offers you Memory based Read-Cache (up to 80% in Windows Server 2012 R2)
  • Continuous availability – Storage Pools and Disks can be clustered with the Microsoft Failover Cluster so if one server goes down the virtual disks and file shares are still available.
  • SMB copy offload – Offloading copy actions to the storage.
  • Snapshots – Create Snapshots and  clone virtual disks on a storage pool.
  • Flexible resiliency options – In Windows Server 2012 you could create a Mirror Spaces with a two-way or three-way mirror, a Parity Space with a single parity and a Simple Space with no data resiliency. New in R2 parity spaces can now be used in clustered pools and there is also a new dual parity option. (enhanced in 2012 R2)
  • Enhanced Rebuilding – Speed of rebuilding of failed disks is enhanced. (enhanced in 2012 R2)
  • Storage Tiering – Windows Server 2012 R2 allows you to use different kind of disks and automatically moves “hot-data” from SAS disks to fast SSD storage. (new in 2012 R2)
  • Write-Back Cache – This feature allows data to be written to SSD first and moves later to the slower SAS tier. (new in 2012 R2)
  • Data Deduplication – Data Deduplication was already included in Windows Server 2012 but it is enhanced in Windows Server 2012 R2, and allows you to use it together with Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV) and supports VDI virtual machines. (enhanced in 2012 R2)

You can get more information about Storage Spaces in Windows Server 2012 R2 in my blog post: What’s new in Windows Server 2012 R2 Storage Spaces

Combine Windows Server Storage Spaces and the Scale-Out File Server Cluster

As mentioned both of this techologies do not require each other, but if you combine them you get a really great solution. You can build your own storage based on Windows Server, which not only allows you to share storage via SMB 3,0 it also allows you to share storage via NFS or iSCSI.

Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces and File Server

A lot of concerns I have heard, was about scale of Storage Spaces. But as I can see scale is absolutely no problem for Windows Server Storage Spaces.  First of all you can build up to 8 nodes in a single cluster which basically would mean you create a 8 node active/active solution. With SMB Multichannel you can use multiple NICs for example 10GbE, infiniband, or even faster network adapters. You can also make use of RDMA which brings latency down to a minimum.

Scale Windows Server Storage SpacesTo scale this even bigger you can go to way, you could setup a new Scale-Out File Server Cluster and create new file shares where virtual machines can be placed. Or you could extend the existing cluster with more servers and more shared SAS disks chassis which don’t have to be connected to the existing servers. This is possible because of  features like CSV Redirected mode hosts can access disks from other hosts even if they are not connected directly via SAS, instead the node is using the Ethernet connection between the hosts.

Scale Windows Server Storage Spaces 2

New features and enhancements in Windows Server 2012 R2 and System Center 2012 R2

With the 2012 R2 releases of Windows Server and System Center Microsoft made some great enhancements to Storage Spaces, Scale-Out File Server, SMB, Hyper-V and System Center. So if you have the chance to work with R2 make sure you check the following:

  • Flexible resiliency options – In Windows Server 2012 you could create a Mirror Spaces with a two-way or three-way mirror, a Parity Space with a single parity and a Simple Space with no data resiliency. New in R2 parity spaces can now be used in clustered pools and there is also a new dual parity option. (enhanced in 2012 R2)
  • Enhanced Rebuilding – Speed of rebuilding of failed disks is enhanced. (enhanced in 2012 R2)
  • Storage Tiering – Windows Server 2012 R2 allows you to use different kind of disks and automatically moves “hot-data” from SAS disks to fast SSD storage. (new in 2012 R2)
  • Write-Back Cache – This feature allows data to be written to SSD first and moves later to the slower SAS tier. (new in 2012 R2)
  • Data Deduplication – Data Deduplication was already included in Windows Server 2012 but it is enhanced in Windows Server 2012 R2, and allows you to use it together with Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV) and supports VDI virtual machines. (enhanced in 2012 R2)
  • Read-Cache – Windows Server CSV Cache offers you Memory based Read-Cache (up to 80% in Windows Server 2012 R2)
  • Management – Management of Hyper-V and Scale-Out File Servers as well as Storage Spaces right in System Center 2012 R2 Virtual Machine Manager.
  • Deployment – Deploy new Scale-Out File Server Clusters with and without Storage Spaces directly from System Center 2012 R2 Virtual Machine Manager via Bare-Metal Deployment.
  • Rebalancing of Scale-Out File Server clients – SMB client connections are tracked per file share (instead of per server), and clients are then redirected to the cluster node with the best access to the volume used by the file share. This improves efficiency by reducing redirection traffic between file server nodes.
  • Improved performance of SMB Direct (SMB over RDMA) – Improves performance for small I/O workloads by increasing efficiency when hosting workloads with small I/Os.
  • SMB event messages -SMB events now contain more detailed and helpful information. This makes troubleshooting easier and reduces the need to capture network traces or enable more detailed diagnostic event logging.
  • Shared VHDX files – Simplifies the creation of guest clusters by using shared VHDX files for shared storage inside the virtual machines.. This also masks the storage for customers if you are a service provider.
  • Hyper-V Live Migration over SMB – Enables you to perform a live migration of virtual machines by using SMB 3.0 as a transport. This allows you to take advantage of key SMB features, such as SMB Direct and SMB Multichannel, by providing high speed migration with low CPU utilization.
  • SMB bandwidth management – Enables you to configure SMB bandwidth limits to control different SMB traffic types. There are three SMB traffic types: default, live migration, and virtual machine.
  • Multiple SMB instances on a Scale-Out File Server – Provides an additional instance on each cluster node in Scale-Out File Servers specifically for CSV traffic. A default instance can handle incoming traffic from SMB clients that are accessing regular file shares, while another instance only handles inter-node CSV traffic.

(Source: TechNet: What’s New for SMB in Windows Server 2012 R2)

I hope I could help with this blog post to understand a little bit more about the Scale-Out File Server and Storage Spaces, and how you can create a great storage solution for your cloud Environment.

Btw the pictures and information are taken from people like Bryan Matthew (Microsoft), Jose Barreto (Microsoft) and Jeff Woolsey (Microsoft).

 

 



Windows Server 2012 SMB Direct RDMA Copy

Hyper-V over SMB: SMB Direct (RDMA)

Another important part of SMB 3.0 and Hyper-V over SMB is the performance. In the past you could use iSCSI, Fiber Channel or FCoE (Fiber Channel over Ethernet). Now SMB 3.0 has a lot of performance improvements to make the Hyper-V over SMB scenario even work. But if you need even more performance you can use new feature which came with Windows Server 2012 and is of course also present in Windows Server 2012 R2 called SMB Direct, which supports the use of network adapters that have Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) capability.  Network adapters with RDMA offer some great enhancements such as very low latency, increased throughput and low CPU utilization since the functionality is offloaded to the network card.

Advantages

  • Increased throughput: Leverages the full throughput of high speed networks where the network adapters coordinate the transfer of large amounts of data at line speed.
  • Low latency: Provides extremely fast responses to network requests, and, as a result, makes remote file storage feel as if it is directly attached block storage.
  • Low CPU utilization: Uses fewer CPU cycles when transferring data over the network, which leaves more power available to server applications.

(Source TechNet)

Technology and Requirements

At the moment there are different versions of network adapters with RDMA capabilities, currently these are iWARP, InfiniBand or RoCE.

  • iWARP, is a simple solution which does not really need any more configuraiton
  • InfiniBand,
  • RoCE (RDMA over Converged Ethernet), which needs also Switches to be configured in the right way for bandwidth management (DCB/PFC)

On the software side you need Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2012 R2 with SMB 3.0. SMB Direct is not supported in previous versions of SMB and Windows Server.

Setup of SMB Direct

Well SMB Direct or RDMA if oyu will is enabled by default, so Windows Server will make use of it when ever possible. But there are some things you have to make sure.

  • Which type of RDMA am I using, is it iWARP, InfiniBand or RoCE. Some of them maybe require additional configuration on the network. If you are using RoCE RDMA seems to work without configuration but you can run into performance issues as my fellow Microsoft MVP Didier van Hoye descripes in his blog post.
  • Install the latest NIC drivers
  • Install the latest firmware
  • Enable SMB Multichannel if you disabled it. SMB Direct will be also disabled when you disable Multichannel.
  • In a Failover Cluster make sure that the RDMA NICs are also marked as client access adapters.
  • SMB Direct doesn’t work with NIC Teaming or Virtual Switches
  • On the file server you should also tune performance by disabling hyper threading, Disabling processor C States and setting the power profile to full power.

Verify SMB configuration

Verify if RDMA is enabled, first cmdlet checks if it’s enabled on the server it self, second one checks if it’s enabled on the network adapters and the third checks if the hardware is RDMA capable.

 
Get-NetOffloadGlobalSetting | Select NetworkDirect
Get-NetAdapterRDMA
Get-NetAdapterHardwareInfo

Verify that SMB Multichannel is enabled, which confirms the NICs are being properly recognized by SMB and that their RDMA capability is being properly identified.

On the client:

 
Get-SmbClientConfiguration | Select EnableMultichannel
Get-SmbClientNetworkInterface

On the server:

 
Get-SmbServerConfiguration | Select EnableMultichannel
Get-SmbServerNetworkInterface
netstat.exe -xan | ? {$_ -match "445"}

And as already mentioned in the SMB Mutlichannel blog post, you can verify the SMB connections:

 
Get-SmbConnection
Get-SmbMultichannelConnection
netstat.exe -xan | ? {$_ -match "445"}

And of course you have some great performance counters.

SMB Direct Performance Counters

If you run some copy jobs you can see the amazing performance (if your storage is fast enough). Here you can also see a print screen with Mellanox ConnectX-3 Ethnernet adapters which are using RoCE in Windows Server 2012. You can see that you don’t see any TCP traffic in the Task Manager on the RDMA NICs.

Windows Server 2012 SMB Direct RDMA Copy

Get more information about SMB Direct on Jose Barretos blog SMB3.info or on Microsoft TechNet.



Hyper-V over SMB

What is Hyper-V over SMB?

With the release of Windows Server 2012 Microsoft offers a new way to store Hyper-V Virtual Machine on a shared storage. In Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Microsoft did only offer block-based shared-storage like Fiber channel or iSCSI. With Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Microsoft allows you to used file-based storage to run Hyper-V Virtual Machine from via the new SMB 3.0 protocol. This means Hyper-V over SMB allows you to store virtual machines on a SMB file share. In the past years I did a lot of Hyper-V implementations working with iSCSI or Fiber channel storage, and I am really happy with the new possibilities SMB 3.0 offers.

The common problem of block storage is that the Hyper-V host has to handle the storage connection. That means if you use iSCSI or fiber channel you have to configure the connection to the storage on the Hyper-V host for example multipath, iSCSI initiator or DSM software. With Hyper-V over SMB you don’t have to configure anything special because SMB 3.0 is built-in to Windows and supporting features like SMB Multichannel are activated and used by default. Of course you have to do some design considerations but this is much less complex than an iSCSI or Fiber Channel implementation.

How did they make it work

The first thing which was important was speed. SMB 3.0 offers a huge performance increase over the SMB 2.x protocol and you totally have to think about it in a different way. There are also a lot of other features like SMB Direct (RDMA), SMB Multichannel or Transparent Failover and many more which help in terms of performance, security and availability, but more on this supporting features in the next post.
Hyper-V over SMB Multichannel

Why Hyper-V over SMB?

Well I already mentioned a lot of reasons why you should use Hyper-V over SMB, but if you think about it there are there main reasons why you should use it.

Costs – Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V allows you to build cluster up to 64 nodes and if you build a clusters this size with fiber channel storage this will be quiet an investment in terms of fiber channel hardware such as HBAs, Switches and cables. By using Hyper-V over SMB you can reduce cost for infrastructure dramatically. Sure maybe you have already invested in a fiber channel storage and a fiber channel infrastructure and you don’t have to change that. For example if you have 100 Hyper-V hosts you may have about 200 HBAs and you also need fiber channel switches. What you could do with Hyper-V over SMB, you could create a Scale-Out File Server Cluster with 8 nodes which are attached to the fiber channel and present the storage to the Hyper-V hosts by using a SMB file share. This would save you a lot money.

Flexibility – Another point which I already mentioned is flexibility. By using Hyper-V over SMB you are removing the Storage dependency from the Hyper-V host and add the storage configuration to the Virtual Machine. In this case you don’t have to configure zoning or iSCSI initiators which is making life for Virtualization Administrators much easier. Here are two examples how IT teams can reduce complexity by using Hyper-V over SMB. First in small IT departments you may not have a dedicated storage team and if you have to add an new Hyper-V host or if you have to reconfigure your storage this can be a lot of difficult work for some people who haven’t much experience with the storage. In enterprise scenario you may have a dedicated Storage and a dedicated Virtualization team and in the most cases they have to work really closely together. For example if the Virtualization team adds another Hyper-V host, the Storage team has to configure the Storage for the host on the Storage site. If the Storage team makes changes to the Storage the Virtualization team eventually has to make changes to the Hyper-V hosts. This dependencies can be reduced by adding a layer between Storage and the Hypervisors and in this case this could be a Scale-Out File Server.

Technology – The third point in my list is technology. Microsoft is not really mention this point but since I have worked with different options like iSCSI, fiber channel or SMB I am a huge fan of SMB 3.0. Fiber channel is a great but expensive technology and people who have worked with iSCSI know that there can be a lot of issues in terms of performance. SMB 3.0 has some great supporting features which can help you increase performance, RDMA which is a technology which can increase networking performance by multiple times and SMB Multichannel which allows you to use multiple network adapters for failover and load balancing are working very well and let you make the most out of your hardware. Another part can be security if you think about encrypting iSCSI networks via IPsec you know that this can be something complex, with SMB Encryption there is a very easy solution for that on the SMB scenario.

I hope I could give you a quick introduction to Hyper-V over SMB and why it’s a good idea consider this in your deployment plans. In the next post I will quickly summarize the supporting features in SMB 3.0.



Geekmania 2012 Recap

Geekmania Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V sessions

Last Friday I had two session at Geekmania 2012, a the conference for real geeks. Together with other architects and engineers of itnetx we were presenting lot of cool stuff around Microsoft Virtualization and Systems Management at Level 400.

geekmania 2012

In my two sessions me and Philipp Witschi from itnetx talked about the new Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V features like Hyper-V Replica and in the second session I focused on Hyper-V over SMB, showing new features and possibilities of SMB 3.0.

A great thing to see was the full cinema hall (around ~120 people) during the Hyper-V and Windows Server 2012 Storage session, which shows the great interested in Hyper-V.

I hope people could learn something new and enjoyed my sessions and Geekmania 2012. It was great to talk to a lot of people about the new Hypervisor.

Geekmania 2012 Private Cloud Sessions

If you enjoyed my sessions I hope you will attend my session about System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012 SP1 on the Swiss TechDays during 19.11. and 20.11. in Basel.